Bookbot

Active Liberty

Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution

Hodnotenie knihy

Parametre

  • 176 stránok
  • 7 hodin čítania

Viac o knihe

Based on the Tanner lectures delivered by Justice Stephen Breyer at Harvard in November 2004, this book defines “active liberty” as the sharing of sovereign authority between the nation and its citizens. Breyer views the Constitution not as a rigid legal framework but as a living guide that adapts to a changing society. He emphasizes that the Constitution's true genius lies in its principles' ability to address contemporary issues rather than adhering to a static interpretation. Through examples in free speech, federalism, privacy, affirmative action, statutory interpretation, and administrative law, Breyer argues that courts should recognize the Constitution’s democratic nature when interpreting texts. He asserts that citizens must engage in community life to gain the experience needed for self-governance. Breyer's unique perspective in the federalism debate posits that deference to congressional power can enhance democratic participation. He contends that, despite its imperfections, Congress has effectively balanced diverse citizen views, especially during crises, better than the executive or judicial branches. With a nuanced understanding of complexity, Breyer advocates for Congress as the appropriate forum for resolving policy disputes, making a significant declaration about democracy and governance.

Vydanie

Nákup knihy

Active Liberty, Stephen Breyer

Jazyk
Rok vydania
2005
Väzba
(pevná),
Stav knihy
Dobrá
Cena
11,99 €

Doručenie

Platobné metódy

3,5
Dobrá
99+ Hodnotenie

Tu nám chýba tvoja recenzia

Titul
Active Liberty
Podtitul
Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution
Jazyk
anglicky
Vydavateľ
Knopf
Rok vydania
2005
Väzba
pevná
Počet strán
176
ISBN10
0307263134
ISBN13
9780307263131
Série
Hodnotenie
3,5 z 5
Anotácia
Based on the Tanner lectures delivered by Justice Stephen Breyer at Harvard in November 2004, this book defines “active liberty” as the sharing of sovereign authority between the nation and its citizens. Breyer views the Constitution not as a rigid legal framework but as a living guide that adapts to a changing society. He emphasizes that the Constitution's true genius lies in its principles' ability to address contemporary issues rather than adhering to a static interpretation. Through examples in free speech, federalism, privacy, affirmative action, statutory interpretation, and administrative law, Breyer argues that courts should recognize the Constitution’s democratic nature when interpreting texts. He asserts that citizens must engage in community life to gain the experience needed for self-governance. Breyer's unique perspective in the federalism debate posits that deference to congressional power can enhance democratic participation. He contends that, despite its imperfections, Congress has effectively balanced diverse citizen views, especially during crises, better than the executive or judicial branches. With a nuanced understanding of complexity, Breyer advocates for Congress as the appropriate forum for resolving policy disputes, making a significant declaration about democracy and governance.