Bookbot

Frans H. van Eemeren

    Frans Hendrik van Eemeren je holandský učenec, ktorého práca sa zameriava na teóriu argumentácie. Spolu s Robom Grootendorstom vyvinul pragmaticko-dialektický prístup, ktorý analyzuje a hodnotí argumentáciu v reálnej praxi. Tento prístup skúma argumentáciu ako komplexný rečový akt v rámci prirodzených jazykových aktivít s konkrétnymi komunikačnými cieľmi. Jeho práca poskytuje hlboký vhľad do dynamiky argumentatívneho diskurzu.

    Overtuigend schrijven
    Handbook of Argumentation Theory
    Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse
    Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
    Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness
    • Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness

      Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules

      • 231 stránok
      • 9 hodin čítania

      The authors present their systematic empirical research on the conventional validity of Pragma-Dialectical discussion rules, grounded in a well-defined theoretical framework. They detail a series of experimental tests conducted to evaluate these rules, providing insights into their effectiveness and applicability in discussions.

      Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness
    • This book provides a clear and comprehensive introduction to argumentation theory from a pragma-dialectical perspective. It covers key topics such as the discipline of argumentation, principles of pragma-dialectics, critical discussions, fallacies, and strategic maneuvering, making it accessible for scholars and advanced students.

      Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
    • Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse

      Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics

      This volume features 50 contributions exploring reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentation theory. It covers van Eemeren's perspectives, pragma-dialectics, strategic maneuvering, fallacies, and the analysis of argumentative discourse. It also includes empirical research findings through experimental and qualitative studies.

      Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse
    • "Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness" by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, and Bert Meuffels explores the validity of pragma-dialectical discussion rules through over a decade of empirical research. The authors examine how ordinary arguers perceive fallacies versus non-fallacies, offering insights into the interplay between theoretical and practical reasonableness.

      Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness
    • Overtuigend schrijven

      • 168 stránok
      • 6 hodin čítania

      Overtuigend schrijven is een doelgerichte methode waarmee de student systematisch verschillende soorten betogende teksten leert schrijven.Het boek vertaalt voor de student de nieuwste theoretische inzichten van de moderne argumentatieleer naar de praktische toepassing ervan in verschillende tekstgenres.

      Overtuigend schrijven