Ian Hacking Knihy

Podtitul: Čo je a čo nie je sociálnou konštrukciou Jeden z najoriginálnejších súčasných filozofov vedy Ian Hacking v knihe rozoberá najzávažnejšie problémy v oblasti sociálnej konštrukcie reality. Ukazuje, že hoci od vydania priekopníckej knihy Petra I. Bergera a Thomasa Luckmana Sociálna konštrukcia reality (1966) uplynulo už takmer 40 rokov, dodnes nie je mnohým autorom – filozofom, sociológom, vedcom z rôznych odvetví – jasný ani len základný pojem. Hacking kritizuje najmä skutočnosť, že novú oblasť postihol údel viacerých pôvodne veľmi perspektívných myšlienok – stali sa módnymi, a tak sa ich zmocnili všetci, od odborníkov až po najväčších laikov. Výsledkom sú spory, ktoré sa niekedy označujú ako „kultúrne vojny“ či „vedecké vojny“. Kniha predstavuje súbor prednášok, ktoré mal autor po celom svete, tematicky ich spája reflexia vývinu názorov na problematiku sociálnej konštrukcie. Publikácia sa vyznačuje jasným výkladom, živým jazykom a nevšedným humorom.

This book showcases Ian Hacking's early ideas on the philosophical issues surrounding statistical reasoning.

Practical tips and techniques to get you started in watercolour.

The book explores the surge in diagnosed dissociative disorders, particularly multiple personality disorder (MPD), over the past twenty-five years, linking it to the prevalence of child sexual abuse. Philosopher Ian Hacking examines the moral and political implications of this epidemic, addressing the contentious debates around memory and the potential for false memories. Through this lens, he critically analyzes how society grapples with psychological trauma and the power dynamics involved in understanding and treating these complex issues.

This book combines detailed scientific historical research with characteristic philosophic breadth and verve.

Modern philosophy of science has paid great attention to the understanding of scientific ‘practice’, in contrast to concentration on scientific ‘method’. Paul Feyerabend’s acclaimed work, which has contributed greatly to this new emphasis, shows the deficiencies of some widespread ideas about the nature of knowledge. He argues that the only feasible explanations of scientific successes are historical explanations, and that anarchism must now replace rationalism in the theory of knowledge.The third edition of this classic text contains a new preface and additional reflections at various points in which the author takes account both of recent debates on science and on the impact of scientific products and practices on the human community. While disavowing populism or relativism, Feyerabend continues to insist that the voice of the inexpert must be heard. Thus many environmental perils were first identified by non-experts against prevailing assumptions in the scientific community. Feyerabend’s challenging reassessment of scientific claims and understandings are as pungent and timely as ever.

This truly philosophical book takes us back to fundamentals - the sheer experience of proof, and the enigmatic relation of mathematics to nature. It asks unexpected questions, such as 'what makes mathematics mathematics?', 'where did proof come from and how did it evolve?', and 'how did the distinction between pure and applied mathematics come into being?' In a wide-ranging discussion that is both immersed in the past and unusually attuned to the competing philosophical ideas of contemporary mathematicians, it shows that proof and other forms of mathematical exploration continue to be living, evolving practices - responsive to new technologies, yet embedded in permanent (and astonishing) facts about human beings. It distinguishes several distinct types of application of mathematics, and shows how each leads to a different philosophical conundrum. Here is a remarkable body of new philosophical thinking about proofs, applications, and other mathematical activities.

Includes an introduction, contextualizing his book in light of developing philosophical trends.

Thomas S. Kuhn's work explaining the process of scientific discovery. This text is the third edition and incorporates a new index.

With the unusual clarity, distinctive and engaging style, and penetrating insight that have drawn such a wide range of readers to his work, Ian Hacking here offers his reflections on the philosophical uses of history. The focus of this volume, which collects both recent and now-classic essays, is the historical emergence of concepts and objects, through new uses of words and sentences in specific settings, and new patterns or styles of reasoning within those sentences. In its lucid and thoroughgoing look at the historical dimension of concepts, the book is at once a systematic formulation of Hacking’s approach and its relation to other types of intellectual history, and a valuable contribution to philosophical understanding.Hacking opens the volume with an extended meditation on the philosophical significance of history. The importance of Michel Foucault―for the development of this theme, and for Hacking’s own work in intellectual history―emerges in the following chapters, which place Hacking’s classic essays on Foucault within the wider context of general reflections on historical methodology. Against this background, Hacking then develops ideas about how language, styles of reasoning, and “psychological” phenomena figure in the articulation of concepts―and in the very prospect of doing philosophy as historical ontology.