Jaakko Hintikka Knihy

Sborník zkoumá některé aspekty Aristotelovy filozofie a logiky.

This brief text assists students in understanding Godel's philosophy and thinking so that they can more fully engage in useful, intelligent class dialogue and improve their understanding of course content. Part of the "Wadsworth Philosophers Series," (which will eventually consist of approximately 100 titles, each focusing on a single "thinker" from ancient times to the present), ON G DEL is written by a philosopher deeply versed in the philosophy of this key thinker. Like other books in the series, this concise book offers sufficient insight into the thinking of a notable philosopher better enabling students to engage in the reading and to discuss the material in class and on paper.

Jaakko Hintikka challenges traditional assumptions in logic, philosophy of mathematics, and metaphysics, advocating for a revised first-order logic. His innovative approach serves as a foundation for exploring mathematical principles, making it a significant contribution to the field. This work is particularly relevant for logicians, philosophers of mathematics, and mathematicians interested in the foundational aspects of their discipline.

The essays in this volume adopt a critical approach to the foundational concepts of mathematics and logic, examining the logical and linguistic tools used by mathematicians. Rather than merely reflecting on existing mathematical practices, the authors scrutinize key concepts, often revealing the need for revision or a fresh perspective. This re-examination is constructive, leading to new possibilities and significant insights within the field. The implications of these analyses are extensive, explored throughout the collection in various papers.

The volume explores the interplay between historical analysis and contemporary philosophical topics, specifically addressing logical and a priori truths. While it primarily aims to provide a historical understanding of earlier thinkers, it incorporates topical discussions to illuminate the conceptual landscape they navigated. This approach emphasizes the importance of context in evaluating historical ideas, akin to a military historian's need to understand the terrain of past battles. The work ultimately seeks to bridge historical inquiry with modern philosophical discourse.

This book explores Aristotle's logic and methodology, emphasizing his use of Socratic questioning and thought-experiments as real experiments. It presents Jaakko Hintikka's interpretations, challenging traditional views and offering fresh insights into logic, epistemology, and metaphysics, appealing to scholars and enthusiasts alike.

This book explores higher-order logics and their semantics, comparing Henkin's interpretations and Quine's skepticism towards logical modalities. It proposes a logic of conceptual possibility aligned with Kant's ideas, while also delving into the complex history of possible-worlds semantics through various theorists.

Exploring the concept of ultimate presuppositions, the essays in this collection delve into a significant dichotomy in twentieth-century philosophical thought. R. G. Collingwood's insights reveal that these presuppositions often remain unexamined until later reflection. The central inquiry revolves around whether language, specifically colloquial language, is universal and inescapable. This theme highlights the implicit assumptions underlying philosophical arguments, suggesting that different thinkers may overlook alternative perspectives while addressing this fundamental question.

Exploring the philosophical insights of Ludwig Wittgenstein, this volume delves into his complex ideas through a collection of half-truths and nuanced interpretations. It offers a critical examination of language, meaning, and the nature of reality, presenting Wittgenstein's thoughts in an accessible manner. The work highlights the interplay between clarity and ambiguity in his philosophy, making it essential for readers interested in the foundations of modern thought and the evolution of linguistic analysis.

This book presents a unique approach to linguistic theorizing, challenging traditional methods that focus on making exceptionless generalizations from specific examples. The author critiques the reliance on invented examples and advocates for using contemporary sources, arguing that intuition about language is often unreliable.