Parametre
- 99 stránok
- 4 hodiny čítania
Viac o knihe
In the 1964 book God & Golem, Inc.: A Comment on Certain Points Where Cybernetics Impinges on Religion, Norbert Wiener lays down his ideas on machine learning, machine reproduction, and the place of machines in society, against a backdrop of religious references. The provocative title sums up the confrontation of technical, mathematical, and imaginative boldness with cultural prejudice. He mentions concerns such as sensory feedback in artificial limbs, the problems of human responsibility in relation to technology, the limits of machine game-playing, Darwinism, Marxism, the Cold War, the rigidity of ideological thinking, and a critique of economy as a science. In the conclusion, he shifts the burden of ethics to politics, away from religion.
Nákup knihy
God & Golem, Inc., Norbert Wiener
- Jazyk
- Rok vydania
- 1966
- product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
- (mäkká)
Platobné metódy
Tu nám chýba tvoja recenzia
- Titul
- God & Golem, Inc.
- Jazyk
- anglicky
- Autori
- Norbert Wiener
- Vydavateľ
- MIT Press
- Rok vydania
- 1966
- Väzba
- mäkká
- Počet strán
- 99
- ISBN10
- 0262730111
- ISBN13
- 9780262730112
- Série
- Štítky
- Náučná literatúra, Spoločenské vedy, Technológie & Priemysel, Ezoterika & Náboženstvo, Psychologická tematika, Filozofická tematika, Náboženské témy, Náboženstvo, Filozofia, Veda, Technológia, Umelá inteligencia
- Hodnotenie
- 3,65 z 5
- Anotácia
- In the 1964 book God & Golem, Inc.: A Comment on Certain Points Where Cybernetics Impinges on Religion, Norbert Wiener lays down his ideas on machine learning, machine reproduction, and the place of machines in society, against a backdrop of religious references. The provocative title sums up the confrontation of technical, mathematical, and imaginative boldness with cultural prejudice. He mentions concerns such as sensory feedback in artificial limbs, the problems of human responsibility in relation to technology, the limits of machine game-playing, Darwinism, Marxism, the Cold War, the rigidity of ideological thinking, and a critique of economy as a science. In the conclusion, he shifts the burden of ethics to politics, away from religion.