Bookbot

The Content and Context of Hate Speech

Rethinking Regulation and Responses

Hodnotenie knihy

Parametre

  • 570 stránok
  • 20 hodin čítania

Viac o knihe

The contributors to this volume consider whether it is possible to establish carefully tailored hate speech policies that are cognizant of the varying traditions, histories, and values of different countries. Throughout, there is a strong comparative emphasis, with examples (and authors) drawn from around the world. All the authors explore whether or when different cultural and historical settings justify different substantive rules given that such cultural relativism can be used to justify content-based restrictions and so endanger freedom of expression. Essays address the following questions, among others: Is hate speech in fact so dangerous or harmful to vulnerable minorities or communities as to justify a lower standard of constitutional protection? What harms and benefits accrue from laws that criminalize hate speech in particular contexts? Are there circumstances in which everyone would agree that hate speech should be criminally punished? What lessons can be learned from international case law?

Nákup knihy

The Content and Context of Hate Speech, Michael Herz, Peter Molnár

Jazyk
Rok vydania
2012
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
(mäkká)
Akonáhle sa objaví, pošleme e-mail.

Platobné metódy

4,0
Veľmi dobrá
4 Hodnotenie

Tu nám chýba tvoja recenzia

Titul
The Content and Context of Hate Speech
Podtitul
Rethinking Regulation and Responses
Jazyk
anglicky
Rok vydania
2012
Väzba
mäkká
Počet strán
570
ISBN10
0521138361
ISBN13
9780521138369
Série
Hodnotenie
4 z 5
Anotácia
The contributors to this volume consider whether it is possible to establish carefully tailored hate speech policies that are cognizant of the varying traditions, histories, and values of different countries. Throughout, there is a strong comparative emphasis, with examples (and authors) drawn from around the world. All the authors explore whether or when different cultural and historical settings justify different substantive rules given that such cultural relativism can be used to justify content-based restrictions and so endanger freedom of expression. Essays address the following questions, among others: Is hate speech in fact so dangerous or harmful to vulnerable minorities or communities as to justify a lower standard of constitutional protection? What harms and benefits accrue from laws that criminalize hate speech in particular contexts? Are there circumstances in which everyone would agree that hate speech should be criminally punished? What lessons can be learned from international case law?